1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:29,840 Revealed in upcoming episodes of this program are the contents of a recently 2 00:00:29,840 --> 00:00:36,840 unearthed repository classified by the secret government, the Phenomenon Archives. 3 00:00:59,840 --> 00:01:29,360 Energy. Without it, the world economy would grind to a catastrophic halt. In the 20th 4 00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:06,360 century, the world's largest planet, the Earth's largest planet, the Earth's largest 5 00:02:06,360 --> 00:02:15,360 planet, the Earth's largest planet, the Earth's largest planet, the Earth's largest planet, 6 00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:24,360 the Earth's largest planet, the Earth's largest planet, the Earth's largest planet, the Earth's 7 00:02:24,360 --> 00:02:30,320 largest planet. Over a century ago, visionary novelist Jules Verne wrote, I believe that 8 00:02:30,320 --> 00:02:37,400 water will one day be employed as a fuel, that hydrogen and oxygen which constitute it, used 9 00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:48,480 singly or together, will furnish an inexhaustible source of heat and light. On March 23, 1989, 10 00:02:48,480 --> 00:02:54,360 Jules Verne's prophecy of a world powered by water rose upon the landscape of popular 11 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:55,360 culture. 12 00:02:55,360 --> 00:03:01,600 Two distinguished chemists, Dr. Martin Fleischmann and Dr. Stanley Ponds announced to the amazement 13 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:07,920 of the world that they had detected a nuclear-like reaction that could turn water into a powerful 14 00:03:07,920 --> 00:03:09,680 new fuel. 15 00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:15,600 Their discovery became known as cold fusion because they said it delivered fusion energy 16 00:03:15,720 --> 00:03:19,560 like that produced in the sun without emitting deadly radiation. 17 00:03:19,560 --> 00:03:24,000 We didn't call it cold fusion at all. 18 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:30,000 That was a term which was wished on us, but we never called it that. 19 00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:36,820 We felt the processes had to be nuclear to account for the high levels of the energy. 20 00:03:36,820 --> 00:03:42,320 In answer to their claim, the Department of Energy quickly assembled a review panel headed 21 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:44,440 up by Dr. John Hezenga. 22 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:51,000 We wrote a very negative report and concluded that the results that were being presented 23 00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:55,920 to us were contrary to everything we had found out about nuclear physics over the last 50 24 00:03:55,920 --> 00:03:59,200 years. 25 00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:04,600 The sword of this panel's condemnation struck with speed and brutality, ignoring the facts 26 00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:07,000 in a blind rush to judgment. 27 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:13,920 Hot fusion physics people have been very vigorous in their denunciation of this being called 28 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:21,800 Right away, reports came in of excess heat, much too large to be from any chemical reaction. 29 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:27,280 Laboratories from Texas to India confirmed the presence of Tritium, a vital determining 30 00:04:27,280 --> 00:04:29,480 feature of a nuclear reaction. 31 00:04:29,480 --> 00:04:34,960 Within two or three weeks, we got the first results and several groups started saying, 32 00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:41,960 yes, we are seeing excess heat, but the most important and unbelievable phenomenon at that 33 00:04:42,880 --> 00:04:45,480 time was the observation of Tritium. 34 00:04:45,480 --> 00:04:48,600 A mud-slinging frenzy followed. 35 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:53,440 The old guard of the scientific establishment, with their powerful influence in media and 36 00:04:53,440 --> 00:05:00,440 government, did everything possible to denounce ponds, fleshmen and their unprecedented work. 37 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:06,040 In conclusion, we have no evidence in our laboratory with any of our samples for fusion. 38 00:05:06,040 --> 00:05:11,200 I'm very sorry that Professor Lewis has no information on the Tritium levels. 39 00:05:11,400 --> 00:05:17,400 This is available and is available in the correction list to the paper. 40 00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:19,200 We know the foreground, we don't know the background. 41 00:05:19,200 --> 00:05:20,200 I would like to specifically... 42 00:05:20,200 --> 00:05:24,720 I beg your pardon, the background is available in the corrections to the paper. 43 00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:25,720 That might be. 44 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:27,720 I would like to specifically hear whether or not helium... 45 00:05:27,720 --> 00:05:30,720 Please don't, don't, don't laugh it off. 46 00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:36,120 ...peer reviewed publications like Nature divisively shamed the discoverers with allegations 47 00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:43,120 of incompetence, touching off one of the greatest tragedies in the history of science. 48 00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:51,080 I think that, broadly speaking, it's dead and it will remain dead for a long, long time. 49 00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:13,120 This was a discovery perhaps as significant as the Wright Brothers' first flight at Kitty 50 00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:22,040 Hawke. But instead of embracing it, the governors of official science declared war on cold fusion. 51 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:27,440 Was the promise of cold fusion too good to be true, or was it trampled on by clothed-minded, 52 00:06:27,440 --> 00:06:32,440 greedy power brokers whose special interests outweighed the public good? 53 00:06:32,440 --> 00:06:38,440 Fusion and oxygen, the components of water, are two of the most reactive elements on Earth. 54 00:06:38,440 --> 00:06:43,520 Electrolysis, the process of extracting them from water as gas, has been known to science 55 00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:49,680 for nearly 200 years. This knowledge has enabled us to develop fuels, some of which are used 56 00:06:49,680 --> 00:06:55,440 to propel manned rockets into space. Though powerful, these chemical fuels don't hold 57 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:59,640 a candle to the energy release of a nuclear reaction. 58 00:06:59,640 --> 00:07:03,880 The fire of this miracle was at the heart of what Ponds and Fleischmann offered to the 59 00:07:03,880 --> 00:07:08,240 world with their groundbreaking cold fusion process. 60 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:15,240 When positively charged deuterons are attracted to the Platium cathode, they cram together 61 00:07:15,240 --> 00:07:20,080 and there are millions and millions of them inside the cathode, getting closer and closer 62 00:07:20,080 --> 00:07:27,080 and then they fuse, and they create energy in the form of helium. There's more energy 63 00:07:27,880 --> 00:07:34,160 in one cubic mile of sea water than in all the known oil reserves on Earth. You could 64 00:07:34,160 --> 00:07:41,160 drive your car 55 million miles on a gallon of heavy water. Maybe the end of pollution. 65 00:07:42,880 --> 00:07:48,120 Hollywood's starry eyed version of energy from water seems the stuff of fantasy, and 66 00:07:48,120 --> 00:07:53,560 while it is true that a definitive theory describing the effect has eluded scientists. 67 00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:59,040 Former chief science writer for MIT, engineer Dr. Eugene Maloff has assembled the evidence 68 00:07:59,040 --> 00:08:02,120 that takes the illusion out of cold fusion. 69 00:08:02,120 --> 00:08:09,120 When I finished my book Fire from Ice in 1991, I concluded that the evidence for cold fusion 70 00:08:09,120 --> 00:08:14,800 was overwhelmingly compelling. Today, we can no longer say that the evidence is overwhelmingly 71 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:17,960 compelling. It is now 100% certain. 72 00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:24,520 Exmised early on by carpers and critics, the field of cold fusion is very much alive. 73 00:08:24,520 --> 00:08:30,560 Energy producing devices exist today that seem to defy the conventions of modern science. 74 00:08:30,560 --> 00:08:37,560 We're getting nuclear energy output without the nuclear radiation byproducts. 75 00:08:37,760 --> 00:08:42,760 If an atom were a huge athletic stadium, at its center would be a nucleus the size of 76 00:08:42,760 --> 00:08:49,040 a pea. In turn, an atom in the eye of this mouse would compare in size to the mouse, 77 00:08:49,040 --> 00:08:55,400 in the same way the mouse compares in size to the entire Earth. This comparison is characteristic 78 00:08:55,400 --> 00:09:01,160 of the monumental challenge faced by scientists worldwide in their effort to unravel the riddle 79 00:09:01,160 --> 00:09:02,760 of the cold fusion effect. 80 00:09:02,760 --> 00:09:07,680 Our critics would say that the problem with cold fusion is that there is no theory to 81 00:09:07,680 --> 00:09:12,680 describe it. The problem is completely different. The problem is that there are far too many 82 00:09:13,280 --> 00:09:18,760 theories which purport to describe the same set of observations. And no more than one 83 00:09:18,760 --> 00:09:21,260 of these theories can be correct. 84 00:09:21,260 --> 00:09:26,440 Fusion takes place when the nuclei of two atoms, usually hydrogen, collide and fuse 85 00:09:26,440 --> 00:09:32,040 together, releasing vast amounts of energy. Prevailing theories suggest that this can 86 00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:39,040 only happen at extreme temperatures like those found on the sun or in a nuclear blast. 87 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:46,280 Experimental reactor facilities like the Jet Plasma Hot Fusion site in England have 88 00:09:46,280 --> 00:09:50,720 attempted to replicate the fusion process of the sun for decades. 89 00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:54,520 Because current technology demands that more energy has to be put into a reaction than 90 00:09:54,520 --> 00:10:01,520 comes out, it hasn't been economically viable. However, Stanley Ponds of the University of 91 00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:07,040 Utah and Martin Fleischman of the University of Southampton claimed that they could create 92 00:10:07,040 --> 00:10:14,040 a fusion reaction at room temperature and make fusion energy a reality with the potential 93 00:10:15,320 --> 00:10:19,720 of making uncounted billions of energy dollars. 94 00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:25,400 Scientists at Hot Fusion facilities like Princeton and MIT seeking to replicate solar fusion 95 00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:31,360 have received untold billions for the building of magnetically ringed Tokamak reactors. Although 96 00:10:31,360 --> 00:10:36,960 a great deal has been learned through experimentation in this field, the process itself has never 97 00:10:36,960 --> 00:10:41,320 produced a single watt of excess power. 98 00:10:41,320 --> 00:10:47,040 At the time of the Ponds and Fleischman announcement, Hot Fusion research was in full swing. Several 99 00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:51,920 powerful university budgets were reliant upon research dollars siphoned off government 100 00:10:51,920 --> 00:10:54,480 coffers into the development of this technology. 101 00:10:54,480 --> 00:11:01,480 Partly it was a very unfortunate time to make such an announcement for various political 102 00:11:01,760 --> 00:11:07,200 reasons really. The situation in the United States, the situation with regard to the program 103 00:11:07,200 --> 00:11:14,200 in Hot Fusion, that was against state. But also of course was the fact that we were not 104 00:11:14,400 --> 00:11:17,080 ready to make such an announcement. 105 00:11:17,080 --> 00:11:24,080 Cold Fusion violates most of what I was taught in nuclear chemistry. 106 00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:29,920 Once you see it happen in front of you and your own apparatus, it's pretty convincing 107 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:35,240 that there's a reality and that's what I base my continued interest on. 108 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:40,360 Since Ponds and Fleischman were both well aware of the pitfalls of premature publicity, why 109 00:11:40,360 --> 00:11:45,200 would they bypass the accepted conventions of the peer review system and announce their 110 00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:46,640 discovery through the media? 111 00:11:46,640 --> 00:11:52,240 I was thinking these guys are not full, they know what they're doing. These are good scientists. 112 00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:57,440 Prior to the 1989 announcement, Stephen E. Jones, a physics professor at nearby Brigham 113 00:11:57,440 --> 00:12:03,060 Young University, learned of Ponds and Fleischman's work through an informant at the DOE. In 114 00:12:03,060 --> 00:12:08,280 a flagrant example of shameless opportunism, Jones insisted on going public quickly with 115 00:12:08,280 --> 00:12:12,080 his comparatively much less clear results. 116 00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:17,120 Disparaging the excess heat claims of Fleischman and Ponds, Jones' announcement would have 117 00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:22,000 effectively prevented the two scientists from patenting their process, a process they had 118 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:25,320 developed on their own over long years of research. 119 00:12:27,640 --> 00:12:31,920 On the advice of university attorneys, Ponds and Fleischman, feeling their backs to the 120 00:12:31,920 --> 00:12:35,920 wall, reluctantly delivered their work to public scrutiny. 121 00:12:39,200 --> 00:12:43,920 Though their discovery posed a very clear challenge to the energy industry, it was the 122 00:12:43,920 --> 00:12:50,320 scientific community, mostly physicists, which raised the specter of doubt and wrongdoing. 123 00:12:50,320 --> 00:12:54,400 This experiment hasn't been produced by any national laboratory or any university yet 124 00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:56,160 without a good football team. 125 00:12:56,160 --> 00:12:59,160 Our cold fusion researcher, Dr. Robert Bush. 126 00:12:59,160 --> 00:13:05,240 Our reaction was not unlike that of other physicists who thought on the one hand, gee, 127 00:13:05,240 --> 00:13:08,880 that would be marvelous if they're doing it, and then on the other hand, my God, chemists 128 00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:15,760 doing it for probably pennies compared to what physicists have taken from the public 129 00:13:15,760 --> 00:13:20,560 coffer over the last 40 years in order of $40 billion to do hot fusion. 130 00:13:20,560 --> 00:13:22,480 It was war from the outset. 131 00:13:22,480 --> 00:13:27,720 On April 14th, 1989, Dr. Glenn Seaborg, a Nobel laureate with a distinguished record 132 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:34,840 in conventional nuclear science, told then President Bush, it is not due to nuclear fusion. 133 00:13:34,840 --> 00:13:39,440 Secretary of Energy, Admiral James Watkins nevertheless enlisted many federally funded 134 00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:42,800 laboratories to investigate the cold fusion claim. 135 00:13:43,560 --> 00:13:49,760 Admiral Watkins, who was at that time headed the Department of Energy, he had an edict. 136 00:13:49,760 --> 00:13:53,920 He said, this must be verified in two weeks. 137 00:13:53,920 --> 00:13:59,040 I'm going to put the whole of the DOE labs on it, as I had put the whole of my team on 138 00:13:59,040 --> 00:14:00,040 it. 139 00:14:00,040 --> 00:14:03,680 And of course, it turned out that you couldn't get any results under four weeks. 140 00:14:03,680 --> 00:14:07,000 So he demanded the impossible, you see. 141 00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:11,520 Massachusetts Institute of Technology was one of the testing facilities selected by the 142 00:14:11,520 --> 00:14:12,960 Department of Energy. 143 00:14:12,960 --> 00:14:18,200 MIT's hot fusion director, Professor Ronald R. Parker, fired the next salvo. 144 00:14:18,200 --> 00:14:23,560 On the front page of the Boston Herald, Parker accused Fleischmann and Ponds of possible fraud 145 00:14:23,560 --> 00:14:27,200 and of engaging in scientific schlock. 146 00:14:27,200 --> 00:14:32,000 It was a well-timed directive to the American Physical Society to go on the attack against 147 00:14:32,000 --> 00:14:34,440 cold fusion. 148 00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:38,640 For instance, Professor William Happer, a hot fusion veteran and advisor to Secretary 149 00:14:38,720 --> 00:14:43,680 Watkins, was quoted as saying, just by looking at Fleischmann and Ponds on television, you 150 00:14:43,680 --> 00:14:46,600 could tell they were incompetent boobs. 151 00:14:46,600 --> 00:14:49,600 Credibility for a scientist is the coin of the realm. 152 00:14:49,600 --> 00:14:54,440 And if you lose that coin, then you can't get grant funding. 153 00:14:54,440 --> 00:14:57,320 Your work becomes regarded as inferior. 154 00:14:57,320 --> 00:15:01,960 And you slip down notches in the eyes of your peers. 155 00:15:01,960 --> 00:15:03,600 And this is a real disaster. 156 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:08,000 For five years prior to their announcement, Fleischmann and Ponds had used their own money 157 00:15:08,080 --> 00:15:12,640 to conduct experiments, passing a current through an electrochemical cell containing 158 00:15:12,640 --> 00:15:15,880 deuterium oxide, heavy water. 159 00:15:15,880 --> 00:15:20,000 One of the electrodes in the cell was made of the precious metal palladium. 160 00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:25,360 The electrical current separated out individual deuterium atoms and forced them to pack tightly 161 00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:27,960 into the palladium cathode. 162 00:15:27,960 --> 00:15:31,000 What happened next remains a mystery. 163 00:15:31,000 --> 00:15:35,320 Whether it was nuclear fusion or something else, the heat energy that came out of that 164 00:15:35,320 --> 00:15:41,240 little jar was thousands to millions of times what could be explained by any known chemical 165 00:15:41,240 --> 00:15:44,240 reaction. 166 00:15:44,240 --> 00:15:57,960 To most classically trained physicists, the idea that low level nuclear reactions could 167 00:15:57,960 --> 00:16:01,440 produce significant heat energy was unthinkable. 168 00:16:01,440 --> 00:16:04,680 The nuclei of atoms are all positively charged. 169 00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:06,000 They repel each other. 170 00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:10,320 They don't want to come together or fuse, except at millions of degrees. 171 00:16:10,320 --> 00:16:14,480 And when they do, deadly radiation can be the result. 172 00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:20,400 The U.S. Department of Energy, or DOE, convened a review panel in April of 1989. 173 00:16:20,400 --> 00:16:25,680 Dr. John Hezinga, an early cold fusion critic, was assigned to a chair position, though his 174 00:16:25,680 --> 00:16:29,000 bias against cold fusion was well known. 175 00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:36,360 Hezinga claimed cold fusion was nonsense and advised authorities against a formal investigation. 176 00:16:36,360 --> 00:16:42,520 By mid-July, the DOE panel had completed their damning report. 177 00:16:42,520 --> 00:16:47,120 Earlier in this century, a very distinguished chemist by the name of Irving Langmer defined 178 00:16:47,120 --> 00:16:51,920 pathological science as the science of things that aren't true. 179 00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:58,560 And I have labeled my book, Cold Fusion, the Scientific Fiasco of the Century, simply because 180 00:16:59,120 --> 00:17:04,560 there's no experimental evidence at this point that any nuclear reaction products have been 181 00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:05,560 formed. 182 00:17:05,560 --> 00:17:12,920 Therefore, the claim that cold fusion is a nuclear reaction process without a commensurate 183 00:17:12,920 --> 00:17:19,400 amount of nuclear reaction products is simply pathological science. 184 00:17:19,400 --> 00:17:24,120 But ten years of results from successful experiments support another conclusion. 185 00:17:24,120 --> 00:17:29,240 There are thousands of papers that have already been published on cold fusion showing the 186 00:17:29,240 --> 00:17:35,440 evidence for the excess heat, the nuclear products including helium, tritium, low-level 187 00:17:35,440 --> 00:17:41,400 neutrons, but at the same time we have the establishment of physics and the establishment 188 00:17:41,400 --> 00:17:45,920 of science for that matter totally ignoring this and in fact mocking it. 189 00:17:45,920 --> 00:17:51,160 Very quickly I realized that cold fusion was going to be the world's best example of 190 00:17:51,160 --> 00:17:52,960 pathological science. 191 00:17:52,960 --> 00:17:59,480 The criticism of pathological science is one which has quite frequently been leveled 192 00:17:59,480 --> 00:18:05,600 at unusual investigations which admittedly sometimes are at fault. 193 00:18:05,600 --> 00:18:14,680 However, there is also the situation that people will criticize a field long after they 194 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:18,600 should really have given up and that is pathological criticism. 195 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:23,840 They just get trapped in a situation, they have made a criticism, they have to maintain 196 00:18:23,840 --> 00:18:27,680 that criticism against all the evidence. 197 00:18:27,680 --> 00:18:33,200 After decades of painstaking observation through his own homemade ground glass lenses, the 198 00:18:33,200 --> 00:18:38,960 Dutch janitor Antony Luwenhoek opened our eyes to the realm of microbiology in the year 199 00:18:38,960 --> 00:18:42,160 1675. 200 00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:47,280 The world of science, however, continued to thumb its nose at the field for nearly 200 201 00:18:47,280 --> 00:19:05,360 years, ridiculing the work of men like the great Louis Pasteur. 202 00:19:05,360 --> 00:19:09,560 Inventor Thomas Edison's vision of a world powered by direct current had its roots in 203 00:19:09,560 --> 00:19:11,360 his own pocketbook. 204 00:19:11,360 --> 00:19:16,400 His public criticisms of the work of rival Nikola Tesla almost cost civilization the 205 00:19:16,400 --> 00:19:21,160 miracle of AC current. 206 00:19:21,160 --> 00:19:28,600 When the Wright brothers first flew in 1903, no papers covered as tall because everybody 207 00:19:28,600 --> 00:19:33,520 was convinced, certainly the American press, that heavy-than-air flight was totally impossible. 208 00:19:33,520 --> 00:19:36,040 All the top scientists said this is nonsense. 209 00:19:36,040 --> 00:19:42,560 And editors wouldn't even bother to send journalists or photographers to interview the Wrights 210 00:19:42,560 --> 00:19:46,280 or even to take pictures of them flying in full public view. 211 00:19:46,280 --> 00:19:53,400 And it wasn't for about five years that eventually they realized, my goodness, this is real. 212 00:19:53,400 --> 00:19:55,120 Heavy-than-air flight is possible. 213 00:19:55,120 --> 00:20:03,560 And I think a similar thing is going to happen with so-called cold fusion. 214 00:20:03,560 --> 00:20:08,440 The scientific groundwork for cold fusion has been accomplished with great difficulty 215 00:20:08,440 --> 00:20:14,720 by underfunded scientists toiling over experiments in laboratories and basements around the world. 216 00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:19,400 Whether their efforts remain eclipsed by hot fusion and other cash cow programs or win 217 00:20:19,400 --> 00:20:24,440 the support of science and the public will be revealed over time. 218 00:20:24,440 --> 00:20:29,120 Despite the nasty accusations made against cold fusion, accomplished scientists like 219 00:20:29,120 --> 00:20:34,200 Dr. Bob Bush and Dr. Edmund Storms of the Los Alamos Laboratory continued their leading 220 00:20:34,200 --> 00:20:37,440 edge work, often producing extraordinary results. 221 00:20:37,440 --> 00:20:43,760 We were seeing this marvelous effect of excess power and integrate over time, excess heat, 222 00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:44,880 in our own laboratory. 223 00:20:44,880 --> 00:20:48,280 So it wasn't as if we had to take somebody else's word for it. 224 00:20:48,280 --> 00:20:49,280 We had proved it. 225 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:54,120 The conclusion was that the amount of palladium that you could fit on your thumb would be 226 00:20:54,120 --> 00:20:58,880 enough to produce a reactor that would supply the city of Los Angeles with all their power 227 00:20:58,880 --> 00:20:59,880 need. 228 00:20:59,880 --> 00:21:04,760 Supporting evidence mounted throughout the 90s, yet revered experts like Hezinga, Happer 229 00:21:04,760 --> 00:21:11,360 and Morrison clung to their original conclusions, flying the one prevailing negative DOE report 230 00:21:11,360 --> 00:21:12,880 as their standard. 231 00:21:12,880 --> 00:21:15,760 There is something new coming up. 232 00:21:15,760 --> 00:21:23,440 You know, professors who teach physics hate to change their courses. 233 00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:32,960 And generally, they don't appreciate monsters which crop up and which cannot be explained. 234 00:21:32,960 --> 00:21:36,720 It was in the frame of the present knowledge. 235 00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:42,960 Sociologists of science have said that if you get four big names in a field of science 236 00:21:42,960 --> 00:21:48,400 to stand up and say that something isn't so, that unfortunately all of the other people 237 00:21:48,400 --> 00:21:51,440 tend to fall into a line kind of herd like. 238 00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:57,680 When science becomes a part of the belief structure of society, you have the danger 239 00:21:57,680 --> 00:22:01,560 that people aren't going to go beyond the boundaries of that science. 240 00:22:01,560 --> 00:22:05,600 In every year we are discovering things that we didn't know last year. 241 00:22:05,600 --> 00:22:11,080 So science must always keep pace with discovery and discovery is a real time process. 242 00:22:11,080 --> 00:22:13,360 It is not about dogma. 243 00:22:13,360 --> 00:22:18,320 Professor George Miley, director of the Fusion Studies Laboratory at the University of Illinois, 244 00:22:18,320 --> 00:22:23,440 was one of the few editors of a peer-reviewed journal to accept papers on cold fusion. 245 00:22:23,440 --> 00:22:28,760 Let's take a tritium as an example which has worked that Tom Clater has done at Los 246 00:22:28,760 --> 00:22:29,760 Alamos. 247 00:22:29,760 --> 00:22:34,680 I was asked him, have you convinced your management at Los Alamos that tritium is real? 248 00:22:34,680 --> 00:22:37,360 And he said, no I haven't. 249 00:22:37,360 --> 00:22:42,320 Problem is that I only get a positive result three times out of ten. 250 00:22:42,320 --> 00:22:44,040 Now think about that. 251 00:22:44,040 --> 00:22:51,520 If it happens once, the inquisitive scientists should say, well how did it happen? 252 00:22:51,520 --> 00:22:56,120 Let's find out how we can ultimately make it happen consistently. 253 00:22:56,120 --> 00:23:01,280 At SRI International, Dr. Michael McCubert was one of the first scientists to replicate 254 00:23:01,280 --> 00:23:03,360 the cold fusion effect. 255 00:23:03,360 --> 00:23:09,040 There is clearly evidence of anomalous excess heat which occur in these experiments. 256 00:23:09,040 --> 00:23:15,040 There are also in similar experiments evidence of an anomalous nuclear process. 257 00:23:15,040 --> 00:23:22,560 It's my suspicion, my bias if you like, that the two anomalies are in fact connected. 258 00:23:22,560 --> 00:23:26,920 In the free-for-all that followed the cold fusion announcement, hot fusion proponents 259 00:23:26,920 --> 00:23:31,840 drew this specious conclusion that cold fusion must work like hot fusion. 260 00:23:31,840 --> 00:23:37,120 If ponds and Fleischmann are alive, they contended, then their results must be faulty since the 261 00:23:37,120 --> 00:23:41,920 neutron radiation from the fusion reaction would surely have killed them. 262 00:23:41,920 --> 00:23:47,760 They refused to consider that another form of the same process might be at work. 263 00:23:47,760 --> 00:23:52,000 In the years that have followed, the cold fusion process has repeatedly produced not 264 00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:57,440 only heat energy, but also nuclear byproducts such as tritium and the ash from a nuclear 265 00:23:57,440 --> 00:24:03,320 reaction, that all-important indicator of nuclear fusion, helium. 266 00:24:03,320 --> 00:24:07,040 It's clearly not possible to produce helium from a chemical process. 267 00:24:07,040 --> 00:24:12,600 The only possibility that remains is that the helium is produced by a nuclear process. 268 00:24:12,600 --> 00:24:18,160 If the helium is produced by a nuclear process, then necessarily there will be an associated 269 00:24:18,160 --> 00:24:19,400 release of heat. 270 00:24:19,400 --> 00:24:25,040 Basically, we were just trying to find out when we had excess heat, would there be helium 271 00:24:25,040 --> 00:24:31,320 present in the sample, and when there was no excess heat, we would find no helium present. 272 00:24:31,320 --> 00:24:34,280 Eight times when we had excess heat, we found helium. 273 00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:41,760 We ran controls six times when there was no excess heat, there was no helium. 274 00:24:41,760 --> 00:24:46,920 Were the alleged negative findings of MIT and Caltech what soured science and the public 275 00:24:46,920 --> 00:24:49,880 to the cold fusion claim? 276 00:24:49,880 --> 00:24:54,880 Ponds and Fleischman had after all breached scientific etiquette by going public first, 277 00:24:54,880 --> 00:24:58,800 instead of through the accepted channels of the peer-reviewed system. 278 00:24:58,800 --> 00:25:05,280 Data should be published in the most reputable of scientific journals. 279 00:25:05,280 --> 00:25:09,120 It should not be published first in the newspapers. 280 00:25:09,120 --> 00:25:15,760 It should not be disseminated through the popular media until in fact the information 281 00:25:15,760 --> 00:25:17,800 can be replicated. 282 00:25:17,800 --> 00:25:21,720 Officials at the University of Utah were chastised for their haste in publicizing the 283 00:25:21,720 --> 00:25:25,240 discovery through the media. 284 00:25:25,240 --> 00:25:27,760 There's a hypothesis, an idea. 285 00:25:27,760 --> 00:25:31,640 The idea is tested in the laboratory. 286 00:25:31,640 --> 00:25:34,080 It's written up in a journal. 287 00:25:34,080 --> 00:25:39,000 It undergoes peer-review, which means people, experts in the field, look at that information. 288 00:25:39,000 --> 00:25:43,640 They test its validity, they ask questions about its validity, then it's published in 289 00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:49,200 the journal, then of course the scientific community reads it, then the scientific community 290 00:25:49,200 --> 00:25:50,640 tries to test it. 291 00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:52,640 Can they repeat this experiment? 292 00:25:52,640 --> 00:25:58,880 Indeed, data affirming vital aspects of the discovery was published in reputable journals. 293 00:25:58,880 --> 00:26:04,120 But the presiding agenda of official science, the science of money and politics, drowned 294 00:26:04,120 --> 00:26:08,040 the truth in accusations of impropriety and outright fraud. 295 00:26:08,040 --> 00:26:14,280 When it was first said by flashmen and ponds at Colfshuson Existed, this went all the way 296 00:26:14,280 --> 00:26:20,560 up to the president, and the president appointed special committee of 22 excellent scientists 297 00:26:20,560 --> 00:26:22,200 to investigate it. 298 00:26:22,200 --> 00:26:25,760 And these scientists announced that they were going to Utah and to other laboratories to 299 00:26:25,760 --> 00:26:27,800 try and see what was happening. 300 00:26:27,800 --> 00:26:32,640 But every time they went to this laboratory, by some miracle none of the cells worked at 301 00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:33,640 this time. 302 00:26:33,640 --> 00:26:40,960 So when the ERAB panel came through with Heisinga as a chairman on July the 6th, 1989, to visit, 303 00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:46,760 they were looking very lightly at the heat measurements and very strongly at the absence 304 00:26:46,760 --> 00:26:48,720 of neutrons and tritium. 305 00:26:48,720 --> 00:26:55,320 Once they saw no neutrons and tritium, they could use that to denounce the field and protect 306 00:26:55,320 --> 00:26:57,440 their budgets. 307 00:26:57,440 --> 00:27:03,240 And fascinatingly, many of the people on that panel, a couple of them I should say, came 308 00:27:03,240 --> 00:27:11,800 to me looking for research funds on this field, even though publicly they were speaking 309 00:27:11,800 --> 00:27:15,200 with our Congress against having Congress put any money in it. 310 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:20,160 Early on they were able to show that ponds and flashmen essentially made some serious 311 00:27:20,160 --> 00:27:23,080 mistakes in their interpretation of the nuclear physics. 312 00:27:23,080 --> 00:27:31,680 Eventually, I think because of this bad nuclear physics, the physicists threw out the good 313 00:27:32,040 --> 00:27:40,040 baby, which was the excess heat effect, along with the bad nuclear interpretation bathwater. 314 00:27:40,400 --> 00:27:44,840 Also working in the field of cold fusion were esteemed scientists with personal knowledge 315 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:49,040 of and confidence in the work of ponds and flashmen. 316 00:27:49,040 --> 00:27:52,560 Scientists whose careers were likewise untarnished. 317 00:27:52,560 --> 00:27:57,600 Texas A&M professor John Bacchris, regarded as a world-class electrochemist, led a research 318 00:27:57,600 --> 00:28:02,000 group at Texas A&M that produced essential evidence of the fusion phenomenon. 319 00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:10,440 The first thing was this thing called tritium, which was a sub-form of hydrogen, which should 320 00:28:10,440 --> 00:28:16,240 not exist except in extremely tiny quantities. 321 00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:23,320 And we found that by working these cells of flashmen and ponds that we could produce this 322 00:28:23,320 --> 00:28:26,040 tritium in great abundance. 323 00:28:26,040 --> 00:28:29,600 That was the first clear proof of the phenomenon. 324 00:28:29,600 --> 00:28:34,960 For two or two or so or not, in the first experiment that we ran some three or four months after 325 00:28:34,960 --> 00:28:38,520 the initial announcement, we saw some evidence of excess heat. 326 00:28:38,520 --> 00:28:44,240 And what we see in our laboratory is no evidence for any unusual nuclear or chemical reactions. 327 00:28:44,240 --> 00:28:52,440 Having seen the effect with my own eyes that claims from a few that this is impossible, 328 00:28:52,440 --> 00:29:00,000 inconsistently with all known laws of nuclear physics, these suggestions are in fact irrelevant. 329 00:29:00,000 --> 00:29:03,720 At Texas A&M, the Bacchris group came under attack. 330 00:29:03,720 --> 00:29:09,040 Science journalist Gary Taubes wrote an inflammatory article in Science Magazine alleging that someone 331 00:29:09,040 --> 00:29:12,160 in the group had spiked the experiment with tritium. 332 00:29:12,160 --> 00:29:16,160 Although proven false, the accusation was enough to smear the work of the group and 333 00:29:16,160 --> 00:29:19,040 place Dr. Bacchris in the line of fire. 334 00:29:19,040 --> 00:29:22,640 Well I was 69 years old at that time and I took the attitude. 335 00:29:22,640 --> 00:29:24,960 I suppose they're farming, right? 336 00:29:24,960 --> 00:29:26,640 It doesn't really matter. 337 00:29:26,640 --> 00:29:28,400 I had my career. 338 00:29:28,400 --> 00:29:31,840 The worst they could do would be to say go. 339 00:29:31,840 --> 00:29:36,480 But finally the university revolted against this. 340 00:29:36,480 --> 00:29:38,480 They set up an inquiry. 341 00:29:38,480 --> 00:29:44,280 Normally we'd say someone's innocent until proven guilty and you'd be given the opportunity 342 00:29:44,280 --> 00:29:53,360 to have a trial rather than having an article written about what you've done wrong and identifies 343 00:29:53,360 --> 00:29:58,640 being guilty in the press rather than due process. 344 00:29:58,640 --> 00:30:00,640 Finally they came out okay. 345 00:30:00,640 --> 00:30:02,800 I mean they gave me another letter. 346 00:30:02,800 --> 00:30:05,920 I'd had the letter of complete exoneration. 347 00:30:05,920 --> 00:30:11,960 But I think the main part was that I had done work which was against the paradigm. 348 00:30:11,960 --> 00:30:16,000 You know people said that they'd been to other universities and people had laughed at it and 349 00:30:16,000 --> 00:30:20,320 said what the heck are you doing trying to disprove the laws of nuclear physics. 350 00:30:20,320 --> 00:30:28,800 And of course that's exactly what we were doing and succeeding. 351 00:30:28,800 --> 00:30:33,760 With government labs like Los Alamos and universities around the world confirming the presence of 352 00:30:33,760 --> 00:30:37,520 excess heat and nuclear products why the continued debate? 353 00:30:37,520 --> 00:30:41,920 Why do influential skeptics still insist that nothing unusual is going on? 354 00:30:41,920 --> 00:30:45,880 What would motivate such blatant distortion of the facts? 355 00:30:45,880 --> 00:30:53,840 Today scientists must live in a world run by finances and not only to maintain the good life for themselves 356 00:30:53,840 --> 00:30:56,680 but also to stock their labs. 357 00:30:56,680 --> 00:31:04,880 Getting more money has become more vital to scientists or as vital to scientists as the research itself. 358 00:31:04,880 --> 00:31:10,560 MIT's Hot Fusion Center, a federally funded facility was among the loudest voices to disparage 359 00:31:10,560 --> 00:31:13,000 the work of Ponds and Fleischmann. 360 00:31:13,000 --> 00:31:18,960 Ironically upon re-examination of their results disturbing inconsistencies appeared. 361 00:31:18,960 --> 00:31:26,360 MIT's raw data provided clear evidence of excess heat but in MIT's official report the graph was altered 362 00:31:26,360 --> 00:31:29,560 to reflect no excess heat. 363 00:31:29,560 --> 00:31:35,520 Engineer Dr. Eugene Malov, chief science journalist in MIT, resigned in protest. 364 00:31:35,520 --> 00:31:37,160 That's what I thought, original. 365 00:31:37,160 --> 00:31:39,760 In the case of MIT it was a disaster. 366 00:31:39,760 --> 00:31:46,760 These people before even analyzing their calorimetry data held a party for the death of coal fusion 367 00:31:46,760 --> 00:31:53,200 and then they manipulated the data to make a positive result look negative. 368 00:31:53,200 --> 00:31:57,520 Their results don't prove coal fusion but they certainly had a positive result. 369 00:31:57,520 --> 00:32:05,720 It's complete nonsense, utterly ridiculous and without foundation and the any allegations 370 00:32:05,720 --> 00:32:10,920 along those lines I believe are made by people that don't understand how measurements are made. 371 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:14,360 An official investigation of the fraud was requested. 372 00:32:14,360 --> 00:32:21,120 MIT President Charles Vest, concurrently a member of the White House advisory panel for the funding of hot fusion 373 00:32:21,120 --> 00:32:25,960 conducted an investigation that was a sham. 374 00:32:25,960 --> 00:32:31,440 MIT's Hot Fusion Lab, the very facility which concocted the damning evidence that helped kill 375 00:32:31,440 --> 00:32:39,720 government funding for coal fusion in the U.S. went on to receive massive federal funding for its own hot fusion research. 376 00:32:39,720 --> 00:32:48,800 To this day MIT's false no is cited as evidence against federal funding and the issuance of U.S. patents in the field. 377 00:32:48,800 --> 00:32:51,600 But MIT did not act alone. 378 00:32:51,600 --> 00:33:00,160 I had a man, he was an employee of one of the national labs and he said that on the plane over he had to Santa Fe 379 00:33:00,160 --> 00:33:09,280 he had shown his boss some positive results, verifying phenomenon and his boss had told him that if he presented those results he'd be fired. 380 00:33:09,280 --> 00:33:14,200 The boss I was working with, at one point I said I should do that kind of experiment, that kind of experiment. 381 00:33:14,200 --> 00:33:19,320 I said look I said I'm more interested by doing something in coal fusion. 382 00:33:19,320 --> 00:33:23,040 I said coal fusion, I mean don't do that. 383 00:33:23,040 --> 00:33:24,520 He said why should I not do that? 384 00:33:24,520 --> 00:33:25,720 He said because it doesn't work. 385 00:33:25,720 --> 00:33:26,920 I said yes it works. 386 00:33:26,920 --> 00:33:35,120 I've done experiments, I know people who have done experiments, I know ponds and flyschman and look, if you decide to do it you cannot work with me anymore 387 00:33:35,120 --> 00:33:38,080 because I don't want my name to be attached to your name. 388 00:33:38,080 --> 00:33:43,680 With congressional funding dead, flyschman and ponds moved to France to carry on their research. 389 00:33:47,280 --> 00:33:53,920 By 1992 we had video recordings of intense energy release. 390 00:33:53,920 --> 00:33:59,200 By the summer of 1994 we had demonstrated sustained energy release. 391 00:33:59,200 --> 00:34:04,080 If you say you want, you wish to make this into a device by about the year 2000. 392 00:34:04,080 --> 00:34:14,480 If the resources had been available we would have got to the year, to that particular point, probably before the year 2000. 393 00:34:14,480 --> 00:34:16,480 But this did not happen. 394 00:34:17,480 --> 00:34:26,480 Coal fusion pioneers carried on despite continued attacks on their reputations and careers. 395 00:34:26,480 --> 00:34:35,480 By 1999 eight international conferences had been held with several thousand technical papers published in peer-reviewed journals worldwide. 396 00:34:35,480 --> 00:34:43,480 In the U.S. the Electric Power Research Institute or EPRI, a private consortium including dozens of utility companies, 397 00:34:43,480 --> 00:34:47,480 had $10 million to investigate coal fusion claims. 398 00:34:47,480 --> 00:34:54,480 In its final report EPRI concluded, quote, definite evidence of nuclear reactions were detected. 399 00:34:54,480 --> 00:35:02,480 But with the federal funding out of the picture, proponents of coal fusion had to look elsewhere to continue their revolutionary science. 400 00:35:02,480 --> 00:35:08,480 In the mid-90s the government of Japan funded a coal fusion program called New Hydrogen Energy. 401 00:35:08,480 --> 00:35:14,480 Though short-lived, it inspired many Japanese scientists to break new ground in this area. 402 00:35:14,480 --> 00:35:19,480 The governments of Italy and France funded research and many private startups in the U.S. 403 00:35:19,480 --> 00:35:29,480 convinced of the commercial potential of the process began securing related patents while carefully avoiding the stigma of being tagged coal fusion. 404 00:35:30,480 --> 00:35:39,480 Over the last decade independent inventors have developed coal fusion devices that have at first glance seen promising, 405 00:35:39,480 --> 00:35:43,480 only to fall short when examined by qualified scientists. 406 00:35:43,480 --> 00:35:51,480 But what if a coal fusion device did exist that produced excess heat consistently before trained independent eyes? 407 00:35:51,480 --> 00:35:58,480 Clean energy technologies of Sarasota, Florida has already brought scientific demonstration cells to market. 408 00:35:58,480 --> 00:36:08,480 Using ordinary water and tiny metal coated beads, they claim their Patterson power cell is produced up to 1,000 times the input power. 409 00:36:08,480 --> 00:36:14,480 Motorola sponsored a test of this cell wherein 20 watts of heat were produced for 11 hours. 410 00:36:14,480 --> 00:36:19,480 This heat continued even after the tiny input electricity was turned off. 411 00:36:19,480 --> 00:36:22,480 They start producing excess heat almost right away, you know. 412 00:36:22,480 --> 00:36:25,480 By the time we do the measurements, there's already excess heat. 413 00:36:25,480 --> 00:36:34,480 While carefully avoiding being called coal fusion, Dr. Randall Mills of Blacklight Power in New Jersey has attracted substantial funding, 414 00:36:34,480 --> 00:36:40,480 creating a company positioned to be a leading manufacturer in the new energy age. 415 00:36:40,480 --> 00:36:48,480 Some of our better experiments with the electrolytic cell have generated as much as 1,000% excess heat. 416 00:36:48,480 --> 00:36:53,480 For example, if we put one watt into the cell, we will get 10 watts out. 417 00:36:53,480 --> 00:37:02,480 This vessel is sitting here making, as we watch, helium 4 and the temperature is 215 degrees centigrade. 418 00:37:02,480 --> 00:37:09,480 This is the key. You change this just a little bit and it doesn't work at all. 419 00:37:09,480 --> 00:37:18,480 Now this is a very novel concept that you can have a nuclear fusion occur at 215 centigrade and 1 atmosphere pressure. 420 00:37:18,480 --> 00:37:24,480 The temperature record quite clearly indicates in these experiments, as it does in less cases experiments, 421 00:37:24,480 --> 00:37:36,480 that there is an unexplained source of heat and the magnitude of that source of heat is approximately the right value to account for the observed helium. 422 00:37:36,480 --> 00:37:42,480 So inside this vessel now for six, seven weeks, we have had deuterium fusing to helium 4 423 00:37:42,480 --> 00:37:49,480 and given this excess temperature of about 35 degrees centigrade, which is big, a really big effect. 424 00:37:49,480 --> 00:38:01,480 The technology of catalytic fusion developed by Dr. Les Case is one of the most extraordinary developments we have in the coal fusion field. 425 00:38:01,480 --> 00:38:07,480 He has excess heat, massive excess heat, and also helium 4 production. 426 00:38:07,480 --> 00:38:14,480 The very nuclear ash that the opponents of coal fusion demanded in the early days. 427 00:38:14,480 --> 00:38:27,480 It appears as though he is very close to having a self-sustaining device that will keep hot by itself, generate steam, hot water, perhaps electricity, before much longer. 428 00:38:28,480 --> 00:38:36,480 Alchemy, the idea that lead can be turned into gold, was always considered a medieval myth. 429 00:38:36,480 --> 00:38:43,480 While modern science has proved the transmutation of elements as possible, the process is far too costly to be practical. 430 00:38:43,480 --> 00:38:54,480 Yet as early as 1992, scientists experimenting with coal fusion observed in their spent cells small amounts of metals like copper, silver, and zinc that simply shouldn't be there. 431 00:38:54,480 --> 00:38:59,480 Kevin Wolf, a nuclear physicist incidentally, made many measurements to treat him. 432 00:38:59,480 --> 00:39:15,480 Then he got some even more astonishing results as early as 1992, which were these transmutational results, the metal forming another metal inside the electrode, which was super, super anti-paradigm. 433 00:39:15,480 --> 00:39:24,480 You know, there's that dreadful word alchemy, which we mustn't use, but it was a form of that in a way, that was creating new metals, you see. 434 00:39:24,480 --> 00:39:34,480 Tareyoshi Omori and Tarehiko Mizuno of the Hokkaido University in Japan produced volumes of data documenting the production of metals from iron to platinum. 435 00:39:34,480 --> 00:39:40,480 Along with these consistently came the production of excess heat energy. 436 00:39:41,480 --> 00:39:46,480 The potential environmental benefits of this technology are awesome. 437 00:39:46,480 --> 00:39:59,480 Companies like SETI, Trenergy, and the Cincinnati Group are developing ways to solve the world's radioactive waste problem, changing radioactive materials into some other form of harmless metal. 438 00:39:59,480 --> 00:40:08,480 In 1999, developments in this area prompted the DOE to award a research grant to Professor George Miley of the University of Illinois. 439 00:40:08,480 --> 00:40:16,480 However, within days of the grant announcement, the ever-vigilant critics of cold fusion science attacked Miley's work and killed his funding. 440 00:40:16,480 --> 00:40:24,480 On the secret panel set up to repeal the grant was the ardent enemy of cold fusion science himself, Dr. John Hizinga. 441 00:40:24,480 --> 00:40:29,480 Nuclear energy was once a laboratory curiosity. 442 00:40:29,480 --> 00:40:34,480 So let's assume that these devices can be developed. 443 00:40:34,480 --> 00:40:37,480 The future is then almost unlimited. 444 00:40:37,480 --> 00:40:47,480 It could be the end of the fossil fuel age, the end of oil and coal, and the end incidentally of many of our worries about global pollution and global warming. 445 00:40:47,480 --> 00:41:01,480 While the environmental challenges faced by the U.S. often make front-page news, the pollution problems encountered by third-world nations and countries relying exclusively on fossil fuels fare much worse. 446 00:41:01,480 --> 00:41:14,480 Two-third of the cities has problems in pollution, and one-third of the land of my country is damaged by the acid rain. 447 00:41:14,480 --> 00:41:20,480 The 80% of the power energy source is from coal. 448 00:41:20,480 --> 00:41:31,480 We have 1.2 billion population, and we anticipate it will be one-half or more billion in the middle of next century. 449 00:41:31,480 --> 00:41:37,480 We consume one ton of the coal per capita. 450 00:41:37,480 --> 00:41:55,480 So if we increase our power consumption by a factor of three, then we will burn about five billion tons of coal in the middle of next century. 451 00:41:56,480 --> 00:42:00,480 What is the ultimate potential of cold fusion technology? 452 00:42:00,480 --> 00:42:09,480 It has been estimated that 250 miles of coal cars could be replaced with as little as one pickup truck full of heavy water. 453 00:42:09,480 --> 00:42:19,480 The daily waste from a 1000 megawatt cold fusion plant would be approximately 150 grams of helium, which is harmless. 454 00:42:19,480 --> 00:42:28,480 Compared to some 30,000 tons of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and other wastes produced by a comparable fossil fuel plant. 455 00:42:31,480 --> 00:42:45,480 What I like about cold fusion is it is different from thermal power, hydroelectric power or nuclear-efficient power because it is potentially small. 456 00:42:45,480 --> 00:42:53,480 And the investments required are much smaller, and hopefully it can be mass produced by industry. 457 00:42:53,480 --> 00:43:01,480 And this completely changes the whole concept of power generation distribution consumption. 458 00:43:01,480 --> 00:43:05,480 I think the electric power grid will absolutely wither away. 459 00:43:05,480 --> 00:43:15,480 I think automobiles, trucks, trains, planes, all forms of transportation will use this new powerful energy source. 460 00:43:15,480 --> 00:43:19,480 The writing is on the wall. The fossil fuel age is about to end. 461 00:43:19,480 --> 00:43:32,480 Every day the burning of fossil fuels contributes to the destruction of our environment, while the breakthrough discovery of a totally clean, virtually unlimited energy source languishes in obscurity. 462 00:43:32,480 --> 00:43:38,480 It's history in the making, what we are living here. I mean, I couldn't dream of a situation like that. 463 00:43:38,480 --> 00:43:53,480 Despite a decade of experimentation and a body of indisputable evidence, the gatekeepers of official science continue to deprive us of a technology we so desperately need to be proper stewards of our world. 464 00:43:54,480 --> 00:44:08,480 Without some morals or something to believe in on this planet, be it God or science or whatever you truly believe in, what do you have? 465 00:44:08,480 --> 00:44:14,480 What do you have? What do you have? What reason do you have to survive? What reason do you have to go on? 466 00:44:14,480 --> 00:44:20,480 We did nothing wrong. We made no mistakes in our observations. We made no mistakes. 467 00:44:21,480 --> 00:44:33,480 In a world where corruption, greed and political maneuvering often win out over the virtues of the human spirit, we believed, perhaps naively, that an exception might exist in the experimental sciences. 468 00:44:33,480 --> 00:44:47,480 The history of science is littered with individual incidents of fraud, patent stealing and flagrant misrepresentation, but here we found a contemporary conspiracy that overshadows most of what we've discovered in the phenomenon archives.